Saturday, August 26, 2023

Vaclav Havel on Politics, Morality, and Civility


From Havel's book, Summer Meditations, published 1992.

The former president of the Czech Republic, at the end of his introduction to the book,

This book is not a collection of essays, or even less a work of political science. It is merely a series of spontaneously written comments on how I see this country [Czech Republic] and its problems today [31 years ago now], how I see its future, and what I wish to put my efforts behind. 

An excerpt from Politics, Morality, and Civility 

As ridiculous or Quixotic as it may sound these days, one thing seems certain to me: that it is my responsibility to emphasize, again and again, the moral origin of all genuine politics, to stress the significance of moral values and standards in all spheres of social life, including economics, and to explain that if we don't try, within ourselves, to discover or rediscover or cultivate what I call "higher responsibility," things will turn out very badly indeed for our country.

As ridiculous or Quixotic as it may sound these days, one thing seems certain to me: that it is my responsibility to emphasize, again and again, the moral origin of all genuine politics, to stress the significance of moral values and standards in all spheres of social life, including economics, and to explain that if we don’t try, within ourselves, to discover or rediscover or cultivate what I call “higher responsibility,” things will turn out very badly indeed for our country. The return of freedom to a society that was morally unhinged has produced something it clearly had to produce, and something we therefore might have expected, but which has turned out to be far more serious than anyone could have predicted: an enormous and dazzling explosion of every imaginable human vice. A wide range of questionable or at least morally ambiguous human tendencies, subtly encouraged over the years and, at the same time, subtly pressed to serve the daily operation of the totalitarian system, have suddenly been liberated, as it were, from their straitjacket and given freedom at last. The authoritarian regime imposed a certain order — if that is the right expression for it — on these vices (and in doing so “legitimized” them, in a sense). This order has now been shattered, but a new order that would limit rather than exploit these vices, an order based on freely accepted responsibility to and for the whole of society, has not yet been built — nor could it have been, for such an order takes years to develop and cultivate.

Thus we are witnesses to a bizarre state of affairs: society has freed itself, true, but in some ways it behaves worse than when it was in chains. Criminality has grown rapidly, and the familiar sewage that in times of historical reversal always wells up from the nether regions of the collective psyche has overcrowded into the mass media, especially the gutter press. But there are other, more serious and dangerous symptoms: hatred among nationalities, suspicion, racism, even signs of Fascism; politicking, an unrestrained, unheeding struggle for purely particular interests, unadulterated ambition, fanaticism of every conceivable kind, new and unprecedented varieties of robbery, the rise of different mafias; and a prevailing lack of tolerance, understanding, taste, moderation, and reason. Here is a new attraction to ideologies, too — as if Marxism had left behind it a great, disturbing void that had to be filled at any cost. 

It is enough to look around our political scene (whose lack of civility is merely a reflection of the more general crisis of civility). In the months leading up to the June 1992 election, almost every political activity, including debates over extremely important legislation in Parliament, has taken place in the shadow of a pre-election campaign, of an extravagant hunger for power and a willingness to gain the favor of a confused electorate by offering a colorful range of attractive nonsense. Mutual accusations, denunciations, and slander among political opponents know no bounds. One politician will undermine another’s work only because they belong to different political parties. Partisan considerations still visibly take precedence over pragmatic attempts to arrive at reasonable and useful solutions to problems. Analysis is pushed out of the press by scandalmongering. Supporting the government in a good cause is practically shameful; kicking it in the shins, on the other hand, is praiseworthy. Sniping at politicians who declare their support for another political group is a matter of course. Anyone can accuse anyone else of intrigue or incompetence, or of having a shady past and shady intentions

Demagogy is rife, and even something as important as the natural longing of a people for autonomy is exploited in power plays, as rivals compete in lying to the public.

****

Havel was looking back on the country in which he grew up under a totalitarian Soviet regime. But he was also prescient. What he described in Politics, Morality, and Civility is now rife in our country. A criminal former president continues to try very hard to overthrow the constitutional democratic republic which has thus far survived centuries. The United States has not known extended periods of time without facing immense challenge. What we face now might be the most horrific challenge yet. I hold firm a belief in We the People. We shall deepen our resolve once more to prevent the Fascist takeover at our door at this moment.   


Saturday, August 19, 2023

Republican gun-owner became outspoken GUN-SAFETY activist in Tennessee UPDATED 8-21-2023 12:55 pm MST



 

Do you ever wonder if the bottom-line might be a form of mass psychosis?

Melissa Alexander, 44, is a Republican gun owner, in Nashville, Tennessee. For all of her life, perhaps, has she cruised along without questioning the cultural and economic hegemony* dominating life in her community?

Reality hit her square in the face on March 27, this year. Her fourth grade son survived a mass shooting but watched in horror as three of his friends and some teachers died.

The shooting at Covenant School, a private Christian school in Nashville, jolted her and fellow moms into political activism for the first time in their life.
On March 27, 2023, a mass shooting occurred at The Covenant School, a  Presbyterian Church in America parochial elementary school in the Green Hills neighborhood of Nashville, Tennessee when Aiden Hale (born Audrey Elizabeth Hale), a transgender man and former student of the school, killed three nine‑year‑old children and three adults before being shot and killed by two Metropolitan Nashville Police Department (MNPD) officers.
Ms. Alexander is among thousands of brand-new Tennessee activists, largely led by mothers, who are pleading with the state legislature to pass stricter gun laws during a special session called by the governor and scheduled to begin on Monday. 

Her son survived an attack that killed three schoolmates and three adults. She is among thousands of new activists pressing the Tennessee legislature to pass stricter gun laws.

The problem is not, in my opinion, that the shooter was a transgender man, but that for whatever reason, Hale felt alienated from the community.

****

How many times have you read something eerily similar to this story? Thousands? How long have you been reading news reports in the United States? Years?

Mass shootings in America are pandemic. Have everyday journalists ever looked behind the curtain to figure out WHY this might be the case? 

Those entrenched in the cultural and economic hegemony of America bicker over whether the problem is too many or too few firearms in our allegedly "free market" capitalist economy. Markets, allegedly an invisible hand that can solve all of our problems with a god-like sweep of a magic wand, seem to only offer get more guns in the hands of Americans as a solution

How safe is our society since overwhelming proliferation of firearms (including assault weapons) overtook our communities? The question answers itself. 

Lawmaking chambers in state capitols and Washington, DC continue to proliferate dysregulation of firearms. 

I'm not a psychoanalyst, even though I may play one from time to time on my blog, but it occurs to me that one possible antidote to this problem might be figuring out how to counter the breakdown of community in our communities and in our country. 

Was there a time when people didn't simply go to work then come home and veg in front of the idiot box until it was time to go back to work?

So goes the premise of Robert Putnam's book, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community

Ms. Alexander's son survived? So, why does she care now about the gun problem in America?

In Frans de Waal's book Mama's Last Hug, the primatologist shares myriad insights on animal and human emotions. One that caught my eye and made me think for more than a minute, 
Rational arguments are woefully insufficient to arrive at moral principles, which get their force from the emotions. The enormous investment we make in rectifying unfairness and injustice—the screaming protests, the marches, the violence, the endurance of police beatings and water cannons, the trolling and bullying on Facebook—remind us that we aren’t dealing with some bloodless mental construct. Absence of fairness and justice shakes us to the core, something that no amount of elegant abstract reasoning will ever accomplish.
De Waal, Frans . Mama's Last Hug: Animal Emotions and What They Tell Us about Ourselves (p. 219). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition. 




*Hegemony is political or cultural dominance or written or unwritten authority over others. The hegemony of the popular kids over the other students means that they determine what is and is not cool.

Sunday, August 13, 2023

According to the 14th Amendment, Section 3; Trump is already disqualified



No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. -- United States Constitution, 14th Amendment, Section Three

In other words, notwithstanding any alleged popular polling lead he reportedly may hold at any time heretofore, the former president (i.e. Trump), as a result of his actions while in office, is DISQUALIFIED FROM ever holding any elected or appointed office in the United States, into perpetuity (i.e. forever).  

This is not a figment of your (or my) imagination. It is not the whim of CREW or Prof. Robert Reich. It is the considered analysis of two prominent Federalist Society legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen.

This law review article is set for publication in 2024 by the University of Pennsylvania Law School and has already been characterized (by Steven Calabresi, law professor at Northwestern and Yale Law Schools, and a founder of the Federalist Society) as a "Tour de Force."

The abstract of the article:

Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids holding office by former office holders who then participate in insurrection or rebellion. Because of a range of misperceptions and mistaken assumptions, Section Three’s full legal consequences have not been appreciated or enforced. This article corrects those mistakes by setting forth the full sweep and force of Section Three.
First, Section Three remains an enforceable part of the Constitution, not limited to the Civil War, and not effectively repealed by nineteenth century amnesty legislation. Second, Section Three is self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office, without the need for additional action by Congress (or courts). It can and should be enforced by every official, state or federal, who judges qualifications. Third, to the extent of any conflict with prior constitutional rules, Section Three repeals, supersedes, or simply satisfies them. This includes the rules against bills of attainder or ex post facto laws, the Due Process Clause, and even the free speech principles of the First Amendment. Fourth, Section Three covers a broad range of conduct against the authority of the constitutional order, including many instances of indirect participation or support as “aid or comfort.” It covers a broad range of former offices, including the Presidency. And in particular, it disqualifies former President Donald Trump, and potentially many others, because of their participation in the attempted overthrow of the 2020 presidential election.

The full (126 page) text of the Law Review Article can be downloaded/read at this link.

From the Salon piece:

Noah Bookbinder, CREW's executive director, explained that disqualification under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is "not a punishment."

"The constitution sets out qualifications for the good of our republic," he tweeted. "Just like a 30-year-old would be disqualified from being president, Donald Trump disqualified himself when he incited insurrection."

The article similarly notes that Section 3 is "self-executing, operating as an immediate disqualification from office."

Aid and comfort? Would that include those Members of Congress who, on January 5th gave reconnaissance tours of the Capitol? Would it reasonably include those members of either chamber of Congress who knowingly voted against accepting the lawful votes of states like Arizona, Georgia, or Michigan (or any other state)?

****

WHAT will follow?

Contrary to what many professional centrists and hope-peddlers in the American mainstream news media and political class would like to believe, the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol was not the climax of the Age of Trump. In reality, Jan. 6 was a proof of concept for how the Republican fascists will use political violence to obtain and keep power against and over the democratic will of the American people in an increasingly diverse society. In all, Jan. 6 was not the end of something but rather the next chapter in what journalist Jeff Sharlet has described as a "slow civil war" here in America.

To that point, in response to his indictment for his alleged crimes of Jan. 6 and the larger plot against democracy, Trump has been escalating his threats of violence, both direct and implied, against Special Counsel Jack Smith, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Judge Tanya Chutkan and the other prosecutors, members of law enforcement, and potential jurors who are attempting to hold him accountable under the law. Law enforcement and other experts in domestic terrorism and national security are continuing to warn that Trump, his MAGA followers and the larger white right constitute an extreme danger to the country's security. On Wednesday, for example, the FBI said that a Utah man who had made threats to President Biden and several prosecutors on different Trump criminal cases was shot and killed during an FBI raid.